Trade, Canada’s Territories and the Arctic Council’s Asian Observers

By Dr Karen Everett
Prime Minister of Japan Shinzō Abe and Prime Minister of Canada Justin Trudeau at the 44th G7 summit. (Government of Japan)

Dr Karen Everett


This is the third article in a series on trade and Canada’s three territories (Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut). While the first and second article examined the territories’ trade with the Arctic states, this article examines their trade with China, Japan, Korea, India and Singapore, which are the Asian Observer states of the Arctic Council. As these states engage with the Arctic more and more, it is important to understand their regional economic interests and the potential trade and economic benefits that may exist for Canada’s three territories. This article begins by identifying Canada’s free trade agreements with the Asian Observer countries, and then provides an overview of the current levels of trade between the five countries and the three territories. Finally, it looks at the challenges and opportunities of growing interest in the Arctic.

Canada’s International Free Trade Agreements

Currently, Canada is a party to two free trade agreements[1] with three of the Asian Observer countries, as shown in Table 1. First, Canada, Japan, and Singapore are signatories to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) that came into force at the end of 2018 following ratification by six of the eleven signatories.[2] Second is the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement (CKFTA) that came into force at the start of 2015.[3]

Table 1: In Force Free Trade Agreements   

Trade Canada Territories Asian Observers

Other free trade agreements are also in various stages of negotiation or exploration. For instance, Canada is engaged in “Exploratory discussions for a possible Canada-China Free Trade Agreement”[4] although discussions do not seem to have advanced since 2017.[5] This is not the only free trade discussion that appears to have stalled. Canada and India are also in the process of negotiating the Canada-India Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA); however, there seems to have been little to no movement on the negotiations since August 2017.[6] Discussions for the Canada-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement also appear to have stalled in 2014.[7] Finally, negotiations for a bilateral free trade agreement with Singapore ended in 2009,[8] although Canada and Singapore, amongst others, are currently engaged in ongoing “Exploratory discussions for a possible Canada-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement.”[9]

This suggests that Canadian businesses should have better access to markets in Japan, Korea and Singapore. However, that may not be the case, especially for businesses in Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut.

Current Trade Numbers with the Asian Observer Countries

Table 2 provides an overview of the total value of import and export trade between Canada, the three territories, and China, India, Japan, Korea, and Singapore in 2018. The table shows that of these five states, China is Canada’s largest trading partner despite not having a free trade agreement in place. Canada, as a whole, also imports more than it exports to these countries.

Table 2: Merchandise Trade with the Asian Observer Countries 2018 (CAD, millions, customs basis)

Trade Canada Territories Asian Observers 2

The table further shows that the three territories do not trade with all of the Asian Observer countries. In 2018, none of the Territories traded with Singapore, although this might change following implementation of the CPTPP. Additionally, Yukon did not import from India or export to Korea, while the Northwest Territories only imported a small amount of goods from Japan and exported to China, India, and Korea, and Nunavut imported from China and exported to China and Japan. With regards to exports, Nunavut exported to the least number of countries, though Yukon had the lowest dollar value in exports overall.

Challenges and Opportunities

To appreciate where the challenges and opportunities lie, we need to understand the economic interest of the Asian Observer countries in the Arctic. India, for example, has a lengthy history of Arctic exploration and scientific activity, as discussed in another PRPI article by Hriday Sarma. According to India’s Ministry of External Affairs website, “Today India’s interests in the Arctic region are scientific, environmental, commercial as well as strategic”[10] although their focus seems to remain on their scientific and environmental interests. That being said, India has started to import energy resources from the Arctic,[11] which might be indicative of a desire to further their economic interests in the region. Singapore also has the potential to contribute to Arctic economic development through the provision of shipping services and building oil and gas rigs.[12]

China seeks to expand their global trading capabilities and is investing in a series of new rail and shipping routes in neighbouring countries as part of their Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).[13] The Arctic factors into the BRI through the Polar Silk Road and potential for new shipping routes through Arctic waters. This would save time and money and is important for China’s economic prosperity. Indeed, “China understands the importance in the opening of Arctic shipping routes to boost its export-driven economy.”[14] Similarly, Japan is interested in the possibility of new shipping routes through the Northern Sea Route (NSR) and “…in August 2012, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Tourism (MLIT) set up a board in order to examine the route’s feasibility and logistics for Japanese shipping companies, including ports in the northern part of Japan.”[15] More recently, Japan has recently sought to enter the Arctic energy market through investment in Russia’s Novatek.[16] Korea also has interests in the Arctic shipping industry and has positioned itself to be a supplier of Arctic vessels, such as tankers and icebreakers, and can also provide Arctic capable telecommunications.[17] Additionally, “Korea has aspired to become a hub for the distribution of oil and other commodities transported through or from the Arctic.”[18] However, despite this interest in Arctic shipping, Moe and Stokke have found that China, Japan and Korea’s “interest in Arctic shipping is real but increasingly cautious, and expectations are considerably lower today than in 2012/2013.”[19] All this is to say that while there is interest in Arctic shipping, it will likely still be some time before these routes are developed.

Another challenge is that China’s Arctic investments are often met with suspicion. For example, China’s 2018 bid to finance an airport development project in Greenland was rejected by the Danish government out of consideration for Denmark’s relationship with the United States and possible security concerns.[20] More recently, at the 2019 Arctic Council Ministerial Meeting, Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, expressed concern about collaborating with Chinese companies on Arctic infrastructure projects.[21] This sentiment was not shared by all, and to this end, just over a week later at the Arctic Circle’s Shanghai Forum, Andrew Leslie, a Canadian Member of Parliament, sent the message that “Canada “welcomes” the chance to work alongside China in the Arctic”.[22] Certainly, the politics of Chinese investment amongst Arctic states could prove challenging when seeking funding for future development projects.

Closer to home, Canada and China are at loggerheads over the house arrest of Huawei’s CFO Meng Wanzhou in Vancouver and the detention of Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor in China.[23] Additionally, the Canadian government is in the midst of determining whether or not it will ban Huawei.[24] Although these events are being addressed at the federal level, there are consequences for the territories. For example, these issues have “caused the Northwest Territories government to put a trade mission to China on hold” in February 2019 despite previous efforts to generate Chinese interest in goods from the NWT.[25] Certainly, there are missed opportunities for the territories as long as diplomatic relations remain shaky.

Geography poses another challenge as many of the Asian Observer states are generally interested in shipping activities through the NSR to European markets. This means that territorial trade opportunities may not improve even if new shipping routes become viable. Furthermore, I have previously written that federal funding for infrastructure development in the Canadian North has yet to prioritise port development, meaning that options to bring goods in and out of the three territories via the Northwest Passage (NWP) would likely remain limited even if trade routes through the NSR were connected to Canada and the NWP. This is further complicated with Canada’s capacity to monitor and enforce its shipping regulations in the NWP. That being said, the government is seeking to improve its monitoring capabilities as evidenced in the recommendations from the Senate’s most recent report on the Arctic[26] and through the potential use of drones.[27]

There is, however, the potential for the territories to expand their trade to Asian markets through existing free trade agreements. For instance, trade relations could be developed between the three territories and Singapore under the auspices of the CPTPP, and, similarly, Nunavut may explore opportunities to trade with Korea via the CKFTA. For these opportunities to come to fruition, however, there needs to be political and economic will in both the territories and with the other states for these opportunities to amount to anything. This will mean that territorial and Federal leaders must work together to develop appealing trade mission strategies that promote the economic strengths of the territories and what they have to offer.

Conclusion

The lack of transportation infrastructure in the Canadian North is certainly a challenge to expanding the territories’ trade relations with the Asian Observer countries. While there are potential opportunities to seek infrastructure investment from outside sources, this may not be looked upon favourably by some of Canada’s Arctic partners. Additionally, the implementation of free trade agreements does not automatically result in new economic opportunities, especially for Canada’s three territories. In order to improve trade opportunities, there needs to be a better understanding of what goods are currently being traded between the territories and China, India, Japan, Korea, while possibilities for trade with Singapore need to be examined. With this information, a clearer picture should emerge on how to better facilitate territorial trade with the Asian Observer countries.


References

Bennett, Mia. “South Korea, an Unlikely Polar Pioneer, Hosts Arctic Conference.” Last modified December 10, 2018. https://www.cryopolitics.com/2018/12/10/korea-arctic-conference/
Alex Brockman. “Northern Canadian Territory Puts Trade Mission to China on Hold Amid Diplomatic Tensions.” Eye on the Arctic. Last modified February 15, 2019. http://www.rcinet.ca/eye-on-the-arctic/2019/02/15/nwt-china-trade-mission-tensions-huawei-arrest-diplomacy/
Choi, Taylor. “Huawei CFO House Arrest Contrasts with Canadians Detained In China.” Reuters. Last modified May 20, 2019. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-huawei-tech-meng/huawei-cfo-house-arrest-contrasts-with-canadians-detained-in-china-idUSKCN1SQ0C3
Connolly, Amanda. “Canada Will Take ‘Measured Approach’ on Possible U.S. Ban of Huawei: Morneau.” Toronto Start. Last modified May 15, 2019. https://globalnews.ca/news/5279165/morneau-canada-measured-approach-possible-us-ban-huawei/
Government of Canada. “Canada-India Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement Negotiations.” Last modified October 24, 2017. https://international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/india-inde/cepa-apeg/index.aspx?lang=eng&_ga=2.127535374.286180289.1553878481-1377243369.1550408810
Government of Canada. “Canada-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement.” Last modified March 14, 2017. https://international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/japan-japon/fta-ale/background-contexte.aspx?lang=eng&_ga=2.130818316.286180289.1553878481-1377243369.1550408810
Government of Canada. “Canada-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Negotiations.” Last modified February 10, 2017. https://international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/singapore-singapour/fta-ale/background-contexte.aspx?lang=eng&_ga=2.106579584.286180289.1553878481-1377243369.1550408810
Government of Canada. “Exploratory Discussions for a Possible Canada-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement.” Last modified March 20, 2019. https://international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/asean-anase/fta-ale/background-contexte.aspx?lang=eng&_ga=2.106579584.286180289.1553878481-1377243369.1550408810
Government of Canada. “Exploratory Discussions on a Possible Canada-China Free Trade Agreement.” Last modified November 17, 2017. https://international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/china-chine/fta-ale/background-contexte.aspx?lang=eng&_ga=2.105589120.286180289.1553878481-1377243369.1550408810
Government of Canada. “What is the CPTPP?” Last modified February 26, 2019.https://international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/cptpp-ptpgp/index.aspx?lang=eng
Government of Canada. “Trade and Investment Agreements.” Last modified March 1, 2019 and last accessed March 29, 2019. https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/index.aspx?lang=eng
Gronholt-Pedersen, Jacob. “Greenland Picks Denmark as Airport Project Partner Over Beijing.” Reuters.  Last modified September 10, 2018, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-silkroad-greenland/greenland-picks-denmark-as-airport-project-partner-over-beijing-idUSKCN1LQ2BX
High North News. “Japan is Entering the Arctic Energy Sector.” High North News. Last modified October 22, 2018. https://www.highnorthnews.com/nb/japan-entering-arctic-energy-sector
Humpert, Malte. “Japan’s Mitsui and Mitsubishi Take 10 Percent Stake in Novatek’s Arctic LNG 2.” High North News.  Last modified June 6, 2019. https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/japans-mitsui-and-mitsubishi-take-10-percent-stake-novateks-arctic-lng-2
India. Ministry of External Affairs. “India and the Arctic.” Last modified June 10, 2013. https://mea.gov.in/in-focus-article.htm?21812/India+and+the+Arctic
Lanteigne, Marc. “Snow Fort or Ice Path? China’s Emerging Strategies in the Arctic.” High North News. Last updated April 24, 2019. https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/chinas-emerging-strategies-arctic.
Lemon, Jason. “China Wants to Build Greenland Airport That Might Threaten U.S. Military Base, Experts Say.” Newsweek. Last modified September 10, 2018. https://www.newsweek.com/china-wants-build-greenland-airport-might-threaten-us-military-base-experts-1114836
Lim, Kong Soon. “China’s Arctic Policy & the Polar Silk Road Vision.” In Arctic Yearbook 2018, edited. Lassi Heininen and Heather Exner-Pirot, 420-436. Akureyri, Iceland: Northern Research Forum, 2018. https://issuu.com/arcticportal/docs/arctic_yearbook_2018
Moe, Arlid and Olav Schram Stokke. “Asian Countries and Arctic Shipping: Policies, Interests and Footprints on Governance.”Arctic Review on Law and Politics 10 (2019): 24-52. https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/1374
Ohnishi, Fujio. East Asia Arctic Relations: Boundary, Security and International Politics. Waterloo, ON: The Centre for International Governance Innovation. 2013. https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/no1a.pdf
Pompeo, Michael R. “Looking North: Sharpening America’s Focus.” U.S. Department of State.  Last modified May 6, 2019. https://www.state.gov/looking-north-sharpening-americas-arctic-focus/
Ramesh, Rashmi. “India’s Arctic Engagement: Shifting from Scientific to Strategic Interests?” Last modified September 25, 2018. https://southasianvoices.org/indias-arctic-engagement-shifting-from-scientific-to-strategic-interests/
Senate of Canada. Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development. Nation-Building At Home, Vigilance Beyond: Preparing For The Coming Decades In The Arctic. April 2019. https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/421/FAAE/Reports/RP10411277/faaerp24/faaerp24-e.pdf
Shalal, Andrea. “Canada Bidding on High-Altitude Surveillance Drone Prototypes.” Toronto Star. Last updated February 20, 2019. https://globalnews.ca/news/4979117/canada-high-altitude-surveillance-drone/
Statistics Canada. “Canadian International Merchandise Trade Database.” Last accessed March 29, 2019.https://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cimt-cicm/home-accueil
Tan, Sam. “What is the Connection Between Singapore and the Arctic Region?” Today Online. Last modified May 23, 2016. https://www.todayonline.com/commentary/what-connection-between-singapore-and-arctic-region
The World Bank. “Belt and Road Initiative.” Last modified March 29, 2018. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/brief/belt-and-road-initiative
Transport Canada. “Drones in the Canadian Arctic”. Last modified April 11, 2018. https://www.tc.gc.ca/en/programs-policies/programs/national-aerial-surveillance-program/drones-canadian-arctic.html.
Vanderklippe, Nathan. “Agreeing on the Arctic: Amid Dispute, Canada Sides with China Over the U.S. on How to Manage the North,”The Globe and Mail, May 10, 2019, https://www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/world/article-agreeing-on-the-arctic-why-canada-sides-with-china-over-the-us-on/?utm_medium=Referrer%3A%2BSocial%2BNetwork%2B%2F%2BMedia&utm_campaign=Shared%2BWeb%2BArticle%2BLinks&__twitter_impression=true
Watters, Stewart and Aki Tonami. “Singapore: An Emerging Arctic Actor.” In Arctic Yearbook 2012, ed. Lassi Heininen and Heather Exner, 104-113. Akureyri, Iceland: Northern Research Forum, 2012. https://arcticyearbook.com/images/yearbook/2012/Scholarly_Papers/5.Tonami_and_Watters_Singapore.pdf

[1]Canada and the Asian Observer countries may also be a party to other types of agreements, such WTO agreements, but they are not the same as free trade agreements and are thus not discussed here.
[2]Government of Canada. “Trade and Investment Agreements,” last modified March 1, 2019 and last accessed March 29, 2019, https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/index.aspx?lang=eng; Government of Canada. “What is the CPTPP?” last modified February 26, 2019, https://international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/cptpp-ptpgp/index.aspx?lang=eng
[3]Government of Canada. “Trade and Investments Agreements”.
[4]Government of Canada. “Trade and Investments Agreements”.
[5]Government of Canada. “Exploratory Discussions on a Possible Canada-China Free Trade Agreement,” last modified November 17, 2017, https://international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/china-chine/fta-ale/background-contexte.aspx?lang=eng&_ga=2.105589120.286180289.1553878481-1377243369.1550408810
[6]Government of Canada. “Canada-India Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement Negotiations,” last modified October 24, 2017, https://international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/india-inde/cepa-apeg/index.aspx?lang=eng&_ga=2.127535374.286180289.1553878481-1377243369.1550408810; Government of Canada. “Trade and Investments Agreements”.
[7]Government of Canada. “Canada-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement,” last modified March 14, 2017, https://international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/japan-japon/fta-ale/background-contexte.aspx?lang=eng&_ga=2.130818316.286180289.1553878481-1377243369.1550408810; Government of Canada. “Trade and Investments Agreements”.
[8]Government of Canada. “Canada-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Negotiations,” last modified February 10, 2017, https://international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/singapore-singapour/fta-ale/background-contexte.aspx?lang=eng&_ga=2.106579584.286180289.1553878481-1377243369.1550408810
[9]Government of Canada. “Exploratory Discussions for a Possible Canada-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement,” last modified March 20, 2019, https://international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/asean-anase/fta-ale/background-contexte.aspx?lang=eng&_ga=2.106579584.286180289.1553878481-1377243369.1550408810
[10]India. Ministry of External Affairs. “India and the Arctic,” last modified June 10, 2013, https://mea.gov.in/in-focus-article.htm?21812/India+and+the+Arctic
[11]Rashmi Ramesh. “India’s Arctic Engagement: Shifting from Scientific to Strategic Interests?,” last modified September 25, 2018, https://southasianvoices.org/indias-arctic-engagement-shifting-from-scientific-to-strategic-interests/
[12]Sam Tan. “What Is the Connection Between Singapore And the Arctic Region?” Today Online, last modified May 23, 2016, https://www.todayonline.com/commentary/what-connection-between-singapore-and-arctic-region; Stewart Watters and Aki Tonami. “Singapore: An Emerging Arctic Actor,” in Arctic Yearbook 2012, ed. Lassi Heininen and Heather Exner-Pirot (Akureyri, Iceland: Northern Research Forum, 2012), 108, 109.
[13]The World Bank. “Belt and Road Initiative,” last modified March 29, 2018, https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/brief/belt-and-road-initiative
[14]Kong Soon Lim. “China’s Arctic Policy & the Polar Silk Road Vision” in Arctic Yearbook 2018, ed. Lassi Heininen and Heather Exner-Pirot (Akureyri, Iceland: Northern Research Forum, 2018), 429
[15]Fujio Ohnishi. East Asia Arctic Relations: Boundary, Security and International Politics. (Waterloo, ON: The Centre for International Governance Innovation, 2013), 3, https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/no1a.pdf
[16]High North News. “Japan is Entering the Arctic Energy Sector,” High North News, last modified October 22, 2018, https://www.highnorthnews.com/nb/japan-entering-arctic-energy-sector; Malte Humpert. “Japan’s Mitsui and Mitsubishi Take 10 Percent Stake in Novatek’s Arctic LNG 2,” High North News, last modified June 6, 2019, https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/japans-mitsui-and-mitsubishi-take-10-percent-stake-novateks-arctic-lng-2
[17]Mia Bennett. “South Korea, an Unlikely Polar Pioneer, Hosts Arctic Conference,” last modified December 10, 2018, https://www.cryopolitics.com/2018/12/10/korea-arctic-conference/
[18]Arild Moe and Olav Schram Stokke. “Asian Countries and Arctic Shipping: Policies, Interests and Footprints on Governance,”Arctic Review on Law and Politics 10 (2019): 35.
[19]Moe and Stokke. “Asian Countries and Arctic Shipping”, 39.
[20]Jason Lemon. “China Wants to Build Greenland Airport That Might Threaten U.S. Military Base, Experts Say,” Newsweek, last modified September 10, 2018, https://www.newsweek.com/china-wants-build-greenland-airport-might-threaten-us-military-base-experts-1114836; see also Marc Lanteigne. “Snow Fort or Ice Path? China’s Emerging Strategies in the Arctic,” High North News, last updated April 24, 2019, https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/chinas-emerging-strategies-arctic.
[21]Michael R. Pompeo. “Looking North: Sharpening America’s Focus,” U.S. Department of State, last modified May 6, 2019. https://www.state.gov/looking-north-sharpening-americas-arctic-focus/
[22]Nathan Vanderklippe. “Agreeing on the Arctic: Amid Dispute, Canada Sides with China Over the U.S. on How to Manage the North,”The Globe and Mail, May 10, 2019, https://www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/world/article-agreeing-on-the-arctic-why-canada-sides-with-china-over-the-us-on/?utm_medium=Referrer%3A%2BSocial%2BNetwork%2B%2F%2BMedia&utm_campaign=Shared%2BWeb%2BArticle%2BLinks&__twitter_impression=true
[23]Taylor Choi. “Huawei CFO House Arrest Contrasts With Canadians Detained In China,” Reuters, last modified May 20, 2019, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-huawei-tech-meng/huawei-cfo-house-arrest-contrasts-with-canadians-detained-in-china-idUSKCN1SQ0C3
[24]Amanda Connolly. “Canada will take ‘measured approach’ on possible U.S. ban of Huawei: Morneau,” Toronto Start, last modified May 15, 2019, https://globalnews.ca/news/5279165/morneau-canada-measured-approach-possible-us-ban-huawei/
[25]Alex Brockman. “Northern Canadian Territory Puts Trade Mission to China on Hold Amid Diplomatic Tensions,” Eye on the Arctic, last modified February 15, 2019, http://www.rcinet.ca/eye-on-the-arctic/2019/02/15/nwt-china-trade-mission-tensions-huawei-arrest-diplomacy/
[26]Senate. Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development. Nation-Building At Home, Vigilance Beyond: Preparing For The Coming Decades In The Arctic, April 2019, https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/421/FAAE/Reports/RP10411277/faaerp24/faaerp24-e.pdf
[27]Transport Canada. “Drones in the Canadian Arctic,” last modified April 11, 2018. https://www.tc.gc.ca/en/programs-policies/programs/national-aerial-surveillance-program/drones-canadian-arctic.html; Andrea Shalal. “Canada Bidding on High-Altitude Surveillance Drone Prototypes,” Toronto Star, last updated February 20, 2019. https://globalnews.ca/news/4979117/canada-high-altitude-surveillance-drone/

 


Dr Karen Everett is a Fellow at Polar Research and Policy Initiative, with a focus on trade and investment in the Canadian North, as well as border security in Arctic and sub-Arctic borderlands. She completed her PhD program at the Frost Centre for Canadian Studies and Indigenous Studies at Trent University where her research examined security in the Canadian North, including emerging regional border management issues. Additionally, she explored how securitisation theory and the principles of multi-level governance can contribute to the policy-making process. She is also a member of the UArctic Thematic Network on Geopolitics and Security. She is currently based in Canada.
Go back
Search
Link partner: indobet luxury777 luxury138 mantra88 roma77 sky77 luxury333 vegas4d indobet ingatbola88 gas138 dolar138 hoki368 batman138 ligagg88 zeus138 bro138 bos88 ligaciputra